AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL
 JJCE Submission Home


A Comparative Study Of Targeted Ground Improvement Alternatives During Site Reclamation

Submitted2019-03-14
Last Update2019-03-14
TitleA Comparative Study Of Targeted Ground Improvement Alternatives During Site Reclamation
Author(s)Author #1
Author title:
Name: Kenan Hazirbaba
Org: Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, American University of Ras Al-Khaimah, P.O. Box 10021, Ras Al-Khaimah, UAE
Country:
Email: kenan.hazirbaba@aurak.ac.ae

Author #2
Author title:
Name: Omer Mughieda
Org: Associate Professor, Abu Dhabi University, UAE
Country:
Email:

Other Author(s)
Contact AuthorAuthor #1
Alt Email: kenan.hazirbaba@aurak.ac.ae
Telephone:
Keywords
AbstractA feasibility study was conducted to assess various ground improvement alternatives and their implementation during site reclamation for the construction of a petrochemical plant on a highly compressible ground. The plan dimensions of the offshore area to be reclaimed were approximately 675 m by 265 m. The ground improvement alternatives included: excavation of the clay layer and replacing it with sand fill; deep soil mixing; jet grouting; prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs) with preload fill; and sand drains with preload fill. In addition, vibrocompaction and deep dynamic compaction methods were considered for densifying the new fill to be placed below water level in the case of excavating and replacing the soft clay layer. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the ground improvement measures that could be used to limit future settlements of the portion of reclamation area where critical structures of the plant will be constructed. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of each alternative were evaluated and analyzed. Additionally, cost and schedule analyses were performed to determine the suitability of each ground improvement method. Excavation and replacement approach was found to be the most expensive option, while PVDs with preload fill method was shown to be the least costly ground improvement alternative.
Paperview paper 4642.pdf (297KB)

http://www.just.edu.jo